![]() | ||
| 29 August 2006 | ||||||||||
|
| REAL ATTITUDES
Politicians actively disputing how the RA national anthem should be. This photo of “decorated» flag show the real attitude of our public towards symbols. TRUE PATRIOTISM Richard Hogland’s appointment as the U.S. Ambassador to Armenia caused a great attention both in Armenia and Diaspora and in the U.S. Armenian lobbyists, as well. Thanks to John Evans who has pronounced the word «genocide», irrespective of the fact he has done it accidentally or in favor of patriotism. But it isn’t secret that the recognition of genocide by the U.S. depends on Evans or Hogland as much as holding fair elections in Armenia depends on Victor Soghomonian. Especially in a country like the U.S. is, the Ambassador expresses the opinion of its government, the latter reflects designed, formulated conception of national interests. Otherwise we can conclude that if Mr. Evans remained in his post, U. S. would change its policy in the problem of genocide. I think our sensuality approach to the political issues. Not only the opinion of ambassador but the president's too can be decisive in the U.S. For instance, the current president of that country isn’t a giant of wisdom but it doesn’t have any influence on the common U.S. citizens, designed mechanisms operate there as there are in the foreign policy. That same person /Bill Clinton for example/ is inclined to recognize the Armenian genocide before and after his posting. But when he feels the post of president he refuses. It’s another approval that the person isn’t decisive at all in the policy of that country.
|
| ||||||||
Who has a good memory, he easily forgets a lot of things. | ||||||||||