To speak about the 20th anniversary of the army in an official, elevated tone and turn a blind eye to the drawbacks is not honest and fair. Today our society, I am convinced, is proud of our army and its history, on one hand, and is more demanding toward this institution, than any other one, on the other. Because, when a tax collector is corrupted, it is considered as a drawback of the given field, whereas when the commander is like that, it is perceived as not only a drawback, but also as a threat to our state security. When an ordinary, “civilian” oligarch exploits the population of his district, sometimes throwing them a few “charity” bones, people just hate such a “great guy,” when an oligarch with general’s shoulder straps does the same thing, his every step arouses innermost protest. When they conceal a murder in the civilian life, it is assessed as a crime of “cops” or prosecutors, whereas when it is done in the army, the mother of every serviceman is alarmed.